Course Evaluation

CSCI 220.10: Theory of Computation

Instructor: A. Rajput

Survey for Term 200501

Results: 6 evaluated this course.

1. Expected grade in the course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	5		83%
Unanswered:	1		17%
A	4		67%	80%
B	1		17%	20%
C	0		0%	0%
D	0		0%	0%
F	0		0%	0%
Don't know	0		0%	0%

2. Type/format of course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Large lecture	1		17%	17%
Small lecture / discussion	5		83%	83%
Seminar / discussion	0		0%	0%
Other	0		0%	0%

3. Difficulty of subject matter

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very easy [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		17%	17%
(3) [3]	1		17%	17%
(4) [4]	3		50%	50%
(5) Very difficult [5]	1		17%	17%
Mean: **		3.67

4. Number of hours per week outside of class typically spent doing readings, assignments, reviewing notes, writing papers, studying for exams

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Less than one hour or none	1		17%	17%
1-2 hours	1		17%	17%
3-4 hours	1		17%	17%
5-6 hours	1		17%	17%
7-8 hours	1		17%	17%
9-10 hours	0		0%	0%
More than 10 hours	1		17%	17%

5. The overall quality of instruction was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all effective [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	1		17%	17%
(4) [4]	3		50%	50%
(5) Very effective [5]	2		33%	33%
Mean: **		4.17

6. The overall quality of the course was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Poor [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	2		33%	33%
(4) [4]	2		33%	33%
(5) Excellent [5]	2		33%	33%
Mean: **		4.00

7. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1]	1		17%	17%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	1		17%	17%
(4) [4]	3		50%	50%
(5) Very challenged [5]	1		17%	17%
Mean: **		3.50

8. Amount of effort / work required was:

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very little [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		33%	33%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	3		50%	50%
(5) A great deal [5]	1		17%	17%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.50

9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		17%	17%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	3		50%	50%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5]	2		33%	33%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.00

10. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	0		0%	0%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5]	6		100%	100%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		5.00

11. Accessibility outside of class.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all accessible [1]	1		17%	17%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	1		17%	17%
(5) Very accessible [5]	2		33%	33%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	2		33%	33%
Mean: **		3.75

12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all fair [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	1		17%	17%
(4) [4]	1		17%	17%
(5) Very fair [5]	4		67%	67%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.50

13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not adequate [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		17%	17%
(3) [3]	2		33%	33%
(4) [4]	0		0%	0%
(5) Very adequate [5]	3		50%	50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.83