Course Evaluation

CSCI 253.10: Object-Oriented Design

Instructor: T. Bragg

Survey for Term 200501

Results: 17 evaluated this course.

1. Expected grade in the course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
A	13		76%	76%
B	2		12%	12%
C	0		0%	0%
D	0		0%	0%
F	0		0%	0%
Don't know	2		12%	12%

2. Type/format of course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Large lecture	5		29%	29%
Small lecture / discussion	11		65%	65%
Seminar / discussion	0		0%	0%
Other	1		6%	6%

3. Difficulty of subject matter

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very easy [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	3		18%	18%
(3) [3]	7		41%	41%
(4) [4]	7		41%	41%
(5) Very difficult [5]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.24

4. Number of hours per week outside of class typically spent doing readings, assignments, reviewing notes, writing papers, studying for exams

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Less than one hour or none	0		0%	0%
1-2 hours	3		18%	18%
3-4 hours	8		47%	47%
5-6 hours	4		24%	24%
7-8 hours	2		12%	12%
9-10 hours	0		0%	0%
More than 10 hours	0		0%	0%

5. The overall quality of instruction was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all effective [1]	2		12%	12%
(2) [2]	1		6%	6%
(3) [3]	3		18%	18%
(4) [4]	10		59%	59%
(5) Very effective [5]	1		6%	6%
Mean: **		3.41

6. The overall quality of the course was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Poor [1]	2		12%	12%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	3		18%	18%
(4) [4]	12		71%	71%
(5) Excellent [5]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.47

7. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1]	1		6%	6%
(2) [2]	2		12%	12%
(3) [3]	6		35%	35%
(4) [4]	7		41%	41%
(5) Very challenged [5]	1		6%	6%
Mean: **		3.29

8. Amount of effort / work required was:

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very little [1]	1		6%	6%
(2) [2]	1		6%	6%
(3) [3]	7		41%	41%
(4) [4]	8		47%	47%
(5) A great deal [5]	0		0%	0%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.29

9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	16		94%
Unanswered:	1		6%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		12%	13%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	6		35%	38%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5]	8		47%	50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.25

10. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	16		94%
Unanswered:	1		6%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1]	1		6%	6%
(2) [2]	2		12%	13%
(3) [3]	2		12%	13%
(4) [4]	7		41%	44%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5]	4		24%	25%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.69

11. Accessibility outside of class.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	16		94%
Unanswered:	1		6%
(1) Not at all accessible [1]	2		12%	13%
(2) [2]	2		12%	13%
(3) [3]	6		35%	38%
(4) [4]	5		29%	31%
(5) Very accessible [5]	0		0%	0%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	1		6%	6%
Mean: **		2.93

12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	15		88%
Unanswered:	2		12%
(1) Not at all fair [1]	1		6%	7%
(2) [2]	2		12%	13%
(3) [3]	2		12%	13%
(4) [4]	5		29%	33%
(5) Very fair [5]	1		6%	7%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	4		24%	27%
Mean: **		3.27

13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	15		88%
Unanswered:	2		12%
(1) Not adequate [1]	6		35%	40%
(2) [2]	5		29%	33%
(3) [3]	1		6%	7%
(4) [4]	2		12%	13%
(5) Very adequate [5]	0		0%	0%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	1		6%	7%
Mean: **		1.93