Course Evaluation

CSCI 286.10: Network Security Principles

Instructor: S. Muftic

Survey for Term 200501

Results: 14 evaluated this course.

1. Expected grade in the course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	14		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
A	5		36%	36%
B	5		36%	36%
C	1		7%	7%
D	0		0%	0%
F	0		0%	0%
Don't know	3		21%	21%

2. Type/format of course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	14		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Large lecture	9		64%	64%
Small lecture / discussion	5		36%	36%
Seminar / discussion	0		0%	0%
Other	0		0%	0%

3. Difficulty of subject matter

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	14		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very easy [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		14%	14%
(3) [3]	3		21%	21%
(4) [4]	8		57%	57%
(5) Very difficult [5]	1		7%	7%
Mean: **		3.57

4. Number of hours per week outside of class typically spent doing readings, assignments, reviewing notes, writing papers, studying for exams

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
Less than one hour or none	1		7%	8%
1-2 hours	3		21%	23%
3-4 hours	2		14%	15%
5-6 hours	2		14%	15%
7-8 hours	3		21%	23%
9-10 hours	2		14%	15%
More than 10 hours	0		0%	0%

5. The overall quality of instruction was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	14		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all effective [1]	1		7%	7%
(2) [2]	1		7%	7%
(3) [3]	1		7%	7%
(4) [4]	5		36%	36%
(5) Very effective [5]	6		43%	43%
Mean: **		4.00

6. The overall quality of the course was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	14		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Poor [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		14%	14%
(3) [3]	3		21%	21%
(4) [4]	4		29%	29%
(5) Excellent [5]	5		36%	36%
Mean: **		3.86

7. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	14		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1]	1		7%	7%
(2) [2]	1		7%	7%
(3) [3]	1		7%	7%
(4) [4]	6		43%	43%
(5) Very challenged [5]	5		36%	36%
Mean: **		3.93

8. Amount of effort / work required was:

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
(1) Very little [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		14%	15%
(3) [3]	4		29%	31%
(4) [4]	3		21%	23%
(5) A great deal [5]	4		29%	31%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.69

9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1]	1		7%	8%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	2		14%	15%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5]	10		71%	77%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.54

10. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		7%	8%
(3) [3]	3		21%	23%
(4) [4]	2		14%	15%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5]	7		50%	54%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.15

11. Accessibility outside of class.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
(1) Not at all accessible [1]	2		14%	15%
(2) [2]	2		14%	15%
(3) [3]	2		14%	15%
(4) [4]	3		21%	23%
(5) Very accessible [5]	1		7%	8%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	3		21%	23%
Mean: **		2.90

12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
(1) Not at all fair [1]	1		7%	8%
(2) [2]	2		14%	15%
(3) [3]	2		14%	15%
(4) [4]	1		7%	8%
(5) Very fair [5]	7		50%	54%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.85

13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	13		93%
Unanswered:	1		7%
(1) Not adequate [1]	2		14%	15%
(2) [2]	2		14%	15%
(3) [3]	1		7%	8%
(4) [4]	2		14%	15%
(5) Very adequate [5]	6		43%	46%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.62