|
Course Evaluation
CSCI 384.MV: Computer Network Defense
Instructor: N. Howard
Survey for Term 200501
Results: 1 evaluated this course.
General Questions
1. Expected grade in the course
| A |
1 |
 |
100% |
100% |
| B |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| C |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| D |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| F |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Don't know |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
Course characteristics
2. Type/format of course
| Large lecture |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Small lecture / discussion |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Seminar / discussion |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Other |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
3. Difficulty of subject matter
| (1) Very easy [1] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| (5) Very difficult [5] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00 |
4. Number of hours per week outside of class
typically spent doing readings, assignments, reviewing notes, writing
papers, studying for exams
| Less than one hour or none |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| 1-2 hours |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| 3-4 hours |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| 5-6 hours |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| 7-8 hours |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| 9-10 hours |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| More than 10 hours |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
Overall rating of the course
5. The overall quality of instruction was
| (1) Not at all effective [1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very effective [5] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00 |
6. The overall quality of the course was
| (1) Poor [1] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Excellent [5] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00 |
7. Overall, how would you rate your level
of intellectual challenge in the course?
| (1) Not at all challenged [1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| (5) Very challenged [5] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00 |
About the course
8. Amount of effort / work required was:
| (1) Very little [1] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) A great deal [5] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Not applicable / No opinion [x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.00 |
About the professor
9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and
course material.
| (1) Not at all knowledgeable
[1] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very knowledgeable [5] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Not applicable / No opinion [x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00 |
10. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.
| (1) Not at all enthusiastic [1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very enthusiastic [5] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Not applicable / No opinion [x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00 |
11. Accessibility outside of class.
| (1) Not at all accessible [1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very accessible [5] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Not applicable / No opinion [x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.00 |
12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.
| (1) Not at all fair [1] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very fair [5] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Not applicable / No opinion [x]
|
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Mean: ** |
-- |
13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.
| (1) Not adequate [1] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2) [2] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3) [3] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4) [4] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very adequate [5] |
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Not applicable / No opinion [x]
|
1 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Mean: ** |
-- |
** - Mean is calculated only for questions whose answers have a
numerical value (indicated in square brackets [ ] next to each
answer). It does not include "Not available/Not applicable" answers (indicated
as [x]).
|
|
801 22nd Street NW, Washington DC 20052 :: T (202) 994-7181 :: F (202) 994-4875