CS@GWU homepage
 Home
 About
 Academics
  - Undergraduate
  - Graduate
  - Courses
  - Resources
 Research
 People
 News & Events
 Prospective Students
 Feedback


world wide web
cs @ gwu

Course Evaluation

CSCI 210 .10 : Advanced Software Paradigms
Instructor: M. Burke
 
Survey for Term Summer 2007 (July 5 - July 14, 2007 )
Participation: Primary Course Shortened Set

Results: 10 out of 32 eligible students evaluated this course.

About the course
[680]
1. Overall rating of the course
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Poor 0   0% 0%
(2) 0   0% 0%
(3) 2 20% 20%
(4) 7 70% 70%
(5) Excellent 1 10% 10%
[16]
2. Amount you learned in the course
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Almost nothing [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 3 30% 30%
(4) [4] 5 50% 50%
(5) A great deal [5] 2 20% 20%
Mean: ** 3.90
[117]
3. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 2 20% 20%
(3) [3] 2 20% 20%
(4) [4] 4 40% 40%
(5) Very challenged [5] 2 20% 20%
Mean: ** 3.60
[123]
4. Amount of effort / work required was:
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Very little [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 10% 11%
(4) [4] 4 40% 44%
(5) A great deal [5] 4 40% 44%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.33
[118]
5. Overall, how would you rate your level of engagement in the subject matter?
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all engaged [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 5 50% 50%
(4) [4] 3 30% 30%
(5) Very engaged [5] 2 20% 20%
Mean: ** 3.70
[129]
6. Increased conceptual understanding and/or critical thinking.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 5 50% 50%
(4) [4] 2 20% 20%
(5) A great deal [5] 3 30% 30%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.80
[122]
7. Course content was organized in a manner that facilitated learning.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Not at all [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 2 20% 22%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 3 30% 33%
(5) Completely [5] 4 40% 44%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.00
About the instructor
[679]
8. Overall rating of the instructor
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Poor 0   0% 0%
(2) 0   0% 0%
(3) 1 10% 10%
(4) 4 40% 40%
(5) Excellent 5 50% 50%
[132]
9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 10% 10%
(4) [4] 1 10% 10%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5] 8 80% 80%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.70
[134]
10. Accessibility outside of class.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 10 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all accessible [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 2 20% 20%
(5) Very accessible [5] 6 60% 60%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 2 20% 20%
Mean: ** 4.75
[133]
11. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 2 20% 22%
(4) [4] 1 10% 11%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5] 6 60% 67%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.44
[135]
12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Not at all fair [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 3 30% 33%
(5) Very fair [5] 5 50% 56%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 1 10% 11%
Mean: ** 4.63
[136]
13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Not adequate [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 2 20% 22%
(5) Very adequate [5] 3 30% 33%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 4 40% 44%
Mean: ** 4.60
[681]
14. Use this space for any comments you may have about the course, the instructor, readings, etc.
  • great professor. 2nd half of content tends to get boring because of all the languages. more practical solutiosn/small project assignments would help.
  • About the Course: The topics cover in CS210 provide an essential foundation in the field of computer programming. Most topics can relate to the practices already in place in various industries. Hence, CS210 served as a reinforcement for those with practical experience or as an in-classroom exposure for those soon to be professionals in the IT field. About the Instructor: The instructor is very knowledgeable on all topics covered, in addition, he explored other areas of interest very much related to software paradigms (CS210). He is very good at presenting the subject, very enthusiastic and always on time.

Department-Specific Questions
[717]
15. I had met all the specified prerequisites for the course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 10% 11%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 8 80% 89%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.78
[718]
16. My previous coursework had adquately prepared me for the course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 3 30% 33%
(4) [4] 2 20% 22%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 4 40% 44%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.11
[757]
17. Through the course, I gained considerable experience in effective techniques for solving real world problems.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 1 10% 11%
(3) [3] 3 30% 33%
(4) [4] 1 10% 11%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 4 40% 44%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.89
[758]
18. My skills in design have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 1 10% 11%
(3) [3] 3 30% 33%
(4) [4] 2 20% 22%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 3 30% 33%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.78
[759]
19. My skills in programming have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 4 40% 44%
(4) [4] 1 10% 11%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 4 40% 44%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.00
[760]
20. My skills in communication have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 9 90%  
Unanswered: 1 10%
(1) Do not agree [1] 1 10% 11%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 2 20% 22%
(4) [4] 2 20% 22%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 2 20% 22%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 2 20% 22%
Mean: ** 3.57
[761]
21. My skills in teamwork have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered