Computer Science @ George Washington University

Undergraduate Course Evaluations - Fall 2000

These are the results of the evaluations for the undergraduate courses offered during the Fall semester of 2000. There were nine questions asked, and the results shown are the average score for each question (max score is 5).

This is the list of questions used in the course evaluations:

1. The instructor's presentations were clear and well organized.
2. The instructor was available for consultation outside of class.
3. The homework, projects, etc. were reasonable and useful.
4. The textbooks were useful and effective.
5. The exams were an appropriate reflection of the lectures and readings.
6. The grading in this course was fair.
7. The students in this course acted ethically.
8. Overall, this course was well taught.
9. Overall, this course was relevant to the degree I am pursuing.

Points explanation:

5: Strongly Agree
4: Agree
3: Neutral
2: Disagree
1: Strongly Disagree

Course Number	Instructor	#1	#2	#3	#4	#5	#6	#7	#8	#9	Overall
CSCI 10.11	ROGERS	3.5	3.4	3.4	2.8	3.7	3.6	3.3	3.3	3.0	3.3
CSCI 10.12	YOO	2.9	3.2	3.5	3.9	2.6	3.4	3.9	2.6	3.1	3.2
CSCI 10.13	DRAGRNOVA	4.8	4.8	4.8	4.9	4.7	5.0	4.9	5.0	4.9	4.9
CSCI 30.10	WHITTAKER	4.0	4.7	4.3	4.3	4.3	4.7	4.7	4.3	3.0	4.3
CSCI 30.11	TAYLOR	4.7	4.5	4.5	4.2	4.3	4.6	4.7	4.4	3.9	4.4
CSCI 41.10	FELDMAN	3.7	4.1	3.4	3.5	3.6	4.2	4.0	3.5	3.9	3.8
CSCI 41.31	SRI	4.5	4.3	3.4	3.4	3.8	4.8	4.4	4.6	3.9	4.1
CSCI 41.32	WANG	4.2	3.7	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.6	4.1	3.4	3.8	3.7
CSCI 49.10	MAURER	3.2	3.8	3.7	2.8	3.4	3.7	3.5	3.6	3.8	3.5
CSCI 49.30	HUANG	3.5	2.8	4.3	4.0	3.3	4.0	3.0	3.8	4.3	3.6
CSCI 51.10	BELLAACHIA	3.7	3.7	3.9	3.7	2.9	3.6	4.2	3.2	4.4	3.7
CSCI 51.30	KIM A	4.2	4.5	3.7	3.4	3.5	3.6	4.0	4.1	4.1	3.9
CSCI 51.31	KIM A	4.6	4.8	4.2	4.0	4.0	4.3	4.6	4.4	4.8	4.4
CSCI 52.10	DRRGANOVA	4.9	5.0	5.0	4.9	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0
CSCI 100.10	VIDRINE	4.5	4.5	4.6	3.1	4.5	4.3	4.5	4.5	4.2	4.3
CSCI 101.10	HAHN	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.5	3.7	3.7	3.6
CSCI 103.10	MAURER	2.4	2.6	2.6	2.6	3.0	3.0	3.5	2.2	2.9	2.7
CSCI 123.10	BERKOVICH	3.2	3.8	3.6	2.8	3.6	3.9	3.5	3.3	3.3	3.4
CSCI 131.10	FELDMAN	3.6	4.5	3.7	3.7	3.8	3.7	4.0	3.6	4.0	3.8
CSCI 131.30	KIM H	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0
CSCI 131.31	KIM H	3.9	4.8	3.2	3.3	3.8	4.3	4.1	3.8	3.9	3.9
CSCI 131.32	ARMSTRONG	3.6	4.3	3.9	3.9	3.8	3.4	3.9	3.8	4.2	3.9
CSCI 131.33	ARMSTRONG	4.5	4.5	4.0	3.9	4.1	4.3	4.4	4.4	4.4	4.3
CSCI 135.31	XIE	2.4	2.4	2.4	2.3	3.1	3.6	3.8	2.4	3.1	2.8
CSCI 141/152.10	SIMHA	4.6	4.3	4.2	3.9	4.1	4.3	4.2	4.5	4.7	4.3
CSCI 146.10	GIEVSKA-KRLIU	4.0	4.6	4.5	3.1	3.7	4.4	4.3	3.9	4.5	4.1
CSCI 146.11	GIEVSKA-KRLIU	4.3	4.8	4.0	3.0	5.0	4.0	4.0	4.3	4.5	4.2
CSCI 156.10	LINDEMAN	4.8	4.7	4.0	3.8	4.2	4.2	4.2	4.4	4.3	4.3
CSCI 173.10	DELLA TORRE	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0
CSCI 178.10	NARAHARI	3.8	3.3	3.8	3.2	3.7	3.9	4.1	3.8	4.2	3.8
CSCI 180.10	NORIEGA	3.7	4.5	4.2	3.7	4.2	4.1	4.5	4.1	4.6	4.2
CSCI 181.10	VITUCCI	4.7	4.3	4.7	5.0	4.5	4.5	5.0	4.7	4.3	4.6
CSCI 181.11	VITUCCI	4.0	4.1	4.0	3.8	3.6	4.0	4.1	4.0	3.7	3.9
CSCI 183.10	BLAN	4.3	3.5	4.2	4.1	4.5	4.3	4.4	4.2	4.4	4.2
CSCI 185.10	DURBIN	3.3	3.2	3.6	3.5	3.7	3.8	3.5	3.3	3.5	3.5
CSCI 194.10	BERKOVICH	4.3	4.5	4.6	4.1	4.5	4.5	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.5
CSCI 195.10	MELTZER	4.6	4.9	4.3	N/A	N/A	4.0	4.5	4.3	4.6	4.4
CSCI 195.11	LINDEMAN	3.5	4.6	3.9	N/A	N/A	4.3	4.8	4.0	4.3	4.2