Course Evaluation

CSCI 135 .31 : Laboratory

Instructor: J. Gomes

Survey for Term Fall 2006

Results: 6 evaluated this course.

1. Integration of discussion, lab, or recitation into the course structure.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		17%	17%
(3) [3]	3		50%	50%
(4) [4]	1		17%	17%
(5) Very well integrated [5]	0		0%	0%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	1		17%	17%
Mean: **		3.00

2. Increased conceptual understanding and/or critical thinking.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all [1]	1		17%	17%
(2) [2]	3		50%	50%
(3) [3]	1		17%	17%
(4) [4]	1		17%	17%
(5) A great deal [5]	0		0%	0%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		2.33

3. Overall rating of the instructor

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Poor	2		33%	33%
(2)	2		33%	33%
(3)	1		17%	17%
(4)	1		17%	17%
(5) Excellent	0		0%	0%

4. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1]	1		17%	17%
(2) [2]	1		17%	17%
(3) [3]	3		50%	50%
(4) [4]	0		0%	0%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5]	1		17%	17%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		2.83

5. Accessibility outside of class.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	6		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all accessible [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	3		50%	50%
(3) [3]	1		17%	17%
(4) [4]	0		0%	0%
(5) Very accessible [5]	1		17%	17%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	1		17%	17%
Mean: **		2.80

6. Use this space for any comments you may have about your discussion, lab, or recitation, etc.