CS@GWU homepage


world wide web
cs @ gwu

Course Evaluation

Course Evaluation

CSCI 151 .10 : Algorithms/Data Structures II
Instructor: R. Simha
 
Survey for Term Fall 2007 (November 28 - December 12, 2007 )
Participation: Primary Course Shortened Set

Results: 7 out of 24 eligible students evaluated this course.

About the course
[680]
1. Overall rating of the course
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 7 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Poor [1] 1 14% 14%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 3 43% 43%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Excellent [5] 3 43% 43%
Mean: ** 3.57
[16]
2. Amount you learned in the course
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 7 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Almost nothing [1] 2 29% 29%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 2 29% 29%
(5) A great deal [5] 3 43% 43%
Mean: ** 3.57
[117]
3. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 7 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1] 1 14% 14%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 2 29% 29%
(4) [4] 1 14% 14%
(5) Very challenged [5] 3 43% 43%
Mean: ** 3.71
[123]
4. Amount of effort / work required was:
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Very little [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 1 14% 17%
(3) [3] 1 14% 17%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) A great deal [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.00
[118]
5. Overall, how would you rate your level of engagement in the subject matter?
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 7 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Not at all engaged [1] 2 29% 29%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 14% 14%
(4) [4] 2 29% 29%
(5) Very engaged [5] 2 29% 29%
Mean: ** 3.29
[129]
6. Increased conceptual understanding and/or critical thinking.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not at all [1] 1 14% 17%
(2) [2] 1 14% 17%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) A great deal [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.67
[122]
7. Course content was organized in a manner that facilitated learning.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not at all [1] 2 29% 33%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Completely [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.50
About the instructor
[679]
8. Overall rating of the instructor
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 7 100%  
Unanswered: 0   0%
(1) Poor [1] 2 29% 29%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 14% 14%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Excellent [5] 4 57% 57%
Mean: ** 3.57
[132]
9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1] 1 14% 17%
(2) [2] 1 14% 17%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.67
[134]
10. Accessibility outside of class.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not at all accessible [1] 1 14% 17%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 14% 17%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Very accessible [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 1 14% 17%
Mean: ** 3.80
[133]
11. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 14% 17%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5] 4 57% 67%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.50
[135]
12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not at all fair [1] 1 14% 17%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 14% 17%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Very fair [5] 2 29% 33%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 1 14% 17%
Mean: ** 3.60
[136]
13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Not adequate [1] 3 43% 50%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Very adequate [5] 2 29% 33%
Not applicable / No opinion [x] 1 14% 17%
Mean: ** 2.60
[681]
14. Use this space for any comments you may have about the course, the instructor, readings, etc.
  • Excellent Professor, give him a raise.
  • Prof. Simha is one of the worst professors I have had at this university. I have no issue with him personally, but as a teacher, I feel he needs to make some drastic changes. First of all, his teaching style is very limited in its ability to cater to different learning styles. There were certainly some people in the class that liked doing everything on their own, but I would have preferred a professor who taught the material, rather than asking us to figure everything out for ourselves. He seems to think it is all very simple, but not everyone's brains work like his. He needs to learn how to teach outside of the very abstract. He should try using visual analogies and finding animations to demonstrate things. Outside of his severely lacking teaching skills, he seems, to put it bluntly, to have an expressive language issue. His assignments are always poorly written; it usually took me around 10 full readings of an assignment to get started properly and then I still had to keep reading over the assignmen
  • The last few lectures were the most interesting because they provided more real world examples for the algorithms described. If other algorithms were described in a similar way, it would make the class more engaging.
  • Prof. Simha is very knowledgeable about algorithms and CS as a whole. This class has challenged me and made me exercise my brain in ways I thought weren't possible! Out of all my CS professors, he is definately one that knows his stuff and is always willing to go the extra mile for students. He is also very patient and kind with students, which I think makes him very approachable. I would suggest having him teach intro level CS courses because he would do a great job of laying a solid CS foundation for students. Thanks for a great semester! C. Chern

Department-Specific Questions
[717]
15. I had met all the specified prerequisites for the course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 6 86% 100%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 5.00
[718]
16. My previous coursework had adquately prepared me for the course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 1 14% 17%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 4 57% 67%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 4.50
[757]
17. Through the course, I gained considerable experience in effective techniques for solving real world problems.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Do not agree [1] 2 29% 33%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.50
[758]
18. My skills in design have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Do not agree [1] 1 14% 17%
(2) [2] 1 14% 17%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.67
[759]
19. My skills in programming have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Do not agree [1] 1 14% 17%
(2) [2] 1 14% 17%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 1 14% 17%
(5) Strongly agree [5] 3 43% 50%
Not applicable/No opinion [x] 0   0% 0%
Mean: ** 3.67
[760]
20. My skills in communication have been helped by taking this course.
  Number Responses Percent
All Excluding Unanswered
Answered: 6 86%  
Unanswered: 1 14%
(1) Do not agree [1] 0   0% 0%
(2) [2] 0   0% 0%
(3) [3] 0   0% 0%
(4) [4] 0   0% 0%
(5) Strongly agree [5]