|
Course Evaluation Course Evaluation
CSCI 191 .10 : Computer Game Dsgn&Progrmng
Instructor:
C. Covington
Survey for Term Fall 2007
(November 28
- December 12, 2007 )
Participation: Primary Course Shortened Set
Results: 5
out of 12 eligible students
evaluated this course.
About the course
[680]
1. Overall rating of the course
| (1) Poor
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Excellent
[5]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| Mean: ** |
4.80
|
[16]
2. Amount you learned in the course
| (1) Almost nothing
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| Mean: ** |
4.40
|
[117]
3. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?
| (1) Not at all challenged
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| (5) Very challenged
[5]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| Mean: ** |
4.40
|
[123]
4. Amount of effort / work required was:
| (1) Very little
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.40
|
[118]
5. Overall, how would you rate your level of engagement in the subject matter?
| (1) Not at all engaged
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Very engaged
[5]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| Mean: ** |
4.80
|
[129]
6. Increased conceptual understanding and/or critical thinking.
| (1) Not at all
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.40
|
[122]
7. Course content was organized in a manner that facilitated learning.
| (1) Not at all
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Completely
[5]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.40
|
About the instructor
[679]
8. Overall rating of the instructor
| (1) Poor
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| (5) Excellent
[5]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| Mean: ** |
4.20
|
[132]
9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.
| (1) Not at all knowledgeable
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very knowledgeable
[5]
|
5 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00
|
[134]
10. Accessibility outside of class.
| (1) Not at all accessible
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Very accessible
[5]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| Mean: ** |
4.75
|
[133]
11. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.
| (1) Not at all enthusiastic
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very enthusiastic
[5]
|
5 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00
|
[135]
12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.
| (1) Not at all fair
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very fair
[5]
|
5 |
|
100% |
100% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
5.00
|
[136]
13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.
| (1) Not adequate
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Very adequate
[5]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.80
|
[681]
14. Use this space for any comments you may have about the course, the instructor, readings, etc.
- The lectures were divided between the two teachers. I felt that the aesthetic ones were not very helpful because they were very broad (not given by C. Covington). It would be a good idea to have the class in the lab room so the art side of the work can be taken care of in the presence of the teacher. It should also be required that he have a deeper understanding of XNA. The technical lectures were quite informative.
- Great course, great idea to have it be based on actually making a game instead of having a final.
Reports were a good idea to accompany the game.
- These ratings were for Chris Covington who taught more of the lectures.
Department-Specific Questions
[717]
15. I had met all the specified prerequisites for the course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.80
|
[718]
16. My previous coursework had adquately prepared me for the course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.60
|
[757]
17. Through the course, I gained considerable experience in effective techniques for solving real world problems.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| Mean: ** |
4.50
|
[758]
18. My skills in design have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
4 |
|
80% |
80% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.80
|
[759]
19. My skills in programming have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
40% |
40% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.60
|
[760]
20. My skills in communication have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
60% |
60% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
1 |
|
20% |
20% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00
|
[761]
21. My skills in teamwork have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0%</ | |
