Course Evaluation

CSCI 050.10: Intro to Fortran Programming

Instructor: R. Harrington

Survey for Term 200501

Results: 19 evaluated this course.

1. Expected grade in the course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
A	16		84%	84%
B	0		0%	0%
C	2		11%	11%
D	0		0%	0%
F	0		0%	0%
Don't know	1		5%	5%

2. Type/format of course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Large lecture	2		11%	11%
Small lecture / discussion	17		89%	89%
Seminar / discussion	0		0%	0%
Other	0		0%	0%

3. Difficulty of subject matter

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very easy [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	4		21%	21%
(3) [3]	10		53%	53%
(4) [4]	4		21%	21%
(5) Very difficult [5]	1		5%	5%
Mean: **		3.11

4. Number of hours per week outside of class typically spent doing readings, assignments, reviewing notes, writing papers, studying for exams

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Less than one hour or none	3		16%	16%
1-2 hours	10		53%	53%
3-4 hours	3		16%	16%
5-6 hours	3		16%	16%
7-8 hours	0		0%	0%
9-10 hours	0		0%	0%
More than 10 hours	0		0%	0%

5. The overall quality of instruction was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all effective [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		11%	11%
(3) [3]	7		37%	37%
(4) [4]	7		37%	37%
(5) Very effective [5]	3		16%	16%
Mean: **		3.58

6. The overall quality of the course was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Poor [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	5		26%	26%
(3) [3]	7		37%	37%
(4) [4]	5		26%	26%
(5) Excellent [5]	2		11%	11%
Mean: **		3.21

7. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1]	3		16%	16%
(2) [2]	3		16%	16%
(3) [3]	6		32%	32%
(4) [4]	6		32%	32%
(5) Very challenged [5]	1		5%	5%
Mean: **		2.95

8. Amount of effort / work required was:

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	19		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very little [1]	2		11%	11%
(2) [2]	6		32%	32%
(3) [3]	7		37%	37%
(4) [4]	1		5%	5%
(5) A great deal [5]	1		5%	5%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	2		11%	11%
Mean: **		2.59

9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		95%
Unanswered:	1		5%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	2		11%	11%
(4) [4]	4		21%	22%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5]	10		53%	56%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	2		11%	11%
Mean: **		4.50

10. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		95%
Unanswered:	1		5%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	4		21%	22%
(4) [4]	5		26%	28%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5]	7		37%	39%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	2		11%	11%
Mean: **		4.19

11. Accessibility outside of class.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		95%
Unanswered:	1		5%
(1) Not at all accessible [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		5%	6%
(3) [3]	3		16%	17%
(4) [4]	2		11%	11%
(5) Very accessible [5]	4		21%	22%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	8		42%	44%
Mean: **		3.90

12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		95%
Unanswered:	1		5%
(1) Not at all fair [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	1		5%	6%
(4) [4]	2		11%	11%
(5) Very fair [5]	12		63%	67%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	3		16%	17%
Mean: **		4.73

13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	17		89%
Unanswered:	2		11%
(1) Not adequate [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	2		11%	12%
(3) [3]	2		11%	12%
(4) [4]	5		26%	29%
(5) Very adequate [5]	6		32%	35%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	2		11%	12%
Mean: **		4.00