Course Evaluation

CSCI 147.10: TeamProjectDevlp & Prof Ethics

Instructor: C. Martin

Survey for Term 200501

Results: 18 evaluated this course.

1. Expected grade in the course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
A	12		67%	67%
B	4		22%	22%
C	0		0%	0%
D	0		0%	0%
F	0		0%	0%
Don't know	2		11%	11%

2. Type/format of course

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Large lecture	9		50%	50%
Small lecture / discussion	7		39%	39%
Seminar / discussion	0		0%	0%
Other	2		11%	11%

3. Difficulty of subject matter

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very easy [1]	2		11%	11%
(2) [2]	7		39%	39%
(3) [3]	7		39%	39%
(4) [4]	1		6%	6%
(5) Very difficult [5]	1		6%	6%
Mean: **		2.56

4. Number of hours per week outside of class typically spent doing readings, assignments, reviewing notes, writing papers, studying for exams

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
Less than one hour or none	1		6%	6%
1-2 hours	6		33%	33%
3-4 hours	3		17%	17%
5-6 hours	6		33%	33%
7-8 hours	1		6%	6%
9-10 hours	1		6%	6%
More than 10 hours	0		0%	0%

5. The overall quality of instruction was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all effective [1]	1		6%	6%
(2) [2]	2		11%	11%
(3) [3]	3		17%	17%
(4) [4]	6		33%	33%
(5) Very effective [5]	6		33%	33%
Mean: **		3.78

6. The overall quality of the course was

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Poor [1]	3		17%	17%
(2) [2]	2		11%	11%
(3) [3]	4		22%	22%
(4) [4]	8		44%	44%
(5) Excellent [5]	1		6%	6%
Mean: **		3.11

7. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all challenged [1]	2		11%	11%
(2) [2]	5		28%	28%
(3) [3]	5		28%	28%
(4) [4]	4		22%	22%
(5) Very challenged [5]	2		11%	11%
Mean: **		2.94

8. Amount of effort / work required was:

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Very little [1]	3		17%	17%
(2) [2]	2		11%	11%
(3) [3]	7		39%	39%
(4) [4]	3		17%	17%
(5) A great deal [5]	3		17%	17%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		3.06

9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all knowledgeable [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		6%	6%
(3) [3]	1		6%	6%
(4) [4]	3		17%	17%
(5) Very knowledgeable [5]	13		72%	72%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.56

10. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all enthusiastic [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	1		6%	6%
(3) [3]	1		6%	6%
(4) [4]	4		22%	22%
(5) Very enthusiastic [5]	12		67%	67%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.50

11. Accessibility outside of class.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all accessible [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	6		33%	33%
(5) Very accessible [5]	7		39%	39%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	5		28%	28%
Mean: **		4.54

12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not at all fair [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	0		0%	0%
(4) [4]	5		28%	28%
(5) Very fair [5]	12		67%	67%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	1		6%	6%
Mean: **		4.71

13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.

	Number Responses	Percent
		All		Excluding Unanswered
Answered:	18		100%
Unanswered:	0		0%
(1) Not adequate [1]	0		0%	0%
(2) [2]	0		0%	0%
(3) [3]	1		6%	6%
(4) [4]	8		44%	44%
(5) Very adequate [5]	9		50%	50%
Not applicable / No opinion [x]	0		0%	0%
Mean: **		4.44