1. Integration of discussion, lab, or recitation into the course structure.
| (1) Not at all
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Very well integrated
[5]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00
|
2. Increased conceptual understanding and/or critical thinking.
| (1) Not at all
[1]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.67
|
3. Overall rating of the instructor
| (1) Poor
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (3)
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Excellent
|
4 |
|
44% |
44% |
4. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.
| (1) Not at all knowledgeable
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Very knowledgeable
[5]
|
5 |
|
56% |
56% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.33
|
5. Accessibility outside of class.
| (1) Not at all accessible
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Very accessible
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Mean: ** |
3.86
|
6. Use this space for any comments you may have about your discussion, lab, or recitation, etc.
- Leming was a great instructor. He gave nice help to the students.
- Seeing other labs the instructor did a lot of lecturing. Leming took a more one-on-one approach and helped you personally. He was very nice and helpful and knowledgeable. I emailed him a few times over spring break and he promptly responded to help me.
- The lab was a joke, I finished projects before class, walked in and handed them in because it wasn't worth doing it there on a mac is a terrible computer to use
7. I had met all the specified prerequisites for the course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Mean: ** |
3.71
|
8. My previous coursework had adquately prepared me for the course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| Mean: ** |
3.38
|
9. Through the course, I gained considerable experience in effective techniques for solving real world problems.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.67
|
10. My skills in design have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (4)
[4]
|
4 |
|
44% |
44% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.56
|
11. My skills in programming have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (4)
[4]
|
6 |
|
67% |
67% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.11
|
12. My skills in communication have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Mean: ** |
3.17
|
13. My skills in teamwork have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Mean: ** |
2.83
|
14. My skills in social responsibility or ethics have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
5 |
|
56% |
56% |
| Mean: ** |
2.75
|
15. The textbooks and/or recommended resources were helpful.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| Mean: ** |
3.63
|
16. Homework, projects and other assignments were effective in reinforcing learning.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
4 |
|
44% |
44% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.89
|
17. The course provided a useful balance between theory and practice.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (3)
[3]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.67
|
18. The course broadly emphasized the fundamenta concepts of computer science.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| Mean: ** |
3.50
|
19. The course was too narrowly focused.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (2)
[2]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
2.44
|
20. The exams were appropriate reflection of the lectures and readings.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| Mean: ** |
3.88
|
21. Lab and computer equipment provided by the department were adequate for completing course assignments.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
4 |
|
44% |
44% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00
|
22. I recieved the grade I had expected.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
22% |
22% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
3 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
11% |
11% |
| Mean: ** |
4.13
|
801 22nd Street NW, Washington DC 20052 :: T (202) 994-7181 :: F (202) 994-4875