Course Evaluation
CSCI 178 .10 : Database Systems I
Instructor:
B. Narahari
Survey for Term Spring 2007
(April 23
- May 6, 2007 )
Participation: Primary Course Shortened Set
Results: 6
evaluated this course.
About the course
1. Overall rating of the course
| (1) Poor
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (3)
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (4)
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Excellent
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
2. Amount you learned in the course
| (1) Almost nothing
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
4 |
|
67% |
67% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Mean: ** |
4.33
|
3. Overall, how would you rate your level of intellectual challenge in the course?
| (1) Not at all challenged
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
| (5) Very challenged
[5]
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
| Mean: ** |
4.50
|
4. Amount of effort / work required was:
| (1) Very little
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
5 |
|
83% |
83% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.83
|
5. Overall, how would you rate your level of engagement in the subject matter?
| (1) Not at all engaged
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Very engaged
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Mean: ** |
3.83
|
6. Increased conceptual understanding and/or critical thinking.
| (1) Not at all
[1]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) A great deal
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.67
|
7. Course content was organized in a manner that facilitated learning.
| (1) Not at all
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (5) Completely
[5]
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.17
|
About the instructor
8. Overall rating of the instructor
| (1) Poor
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
| (4)
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Excellent
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
9. Was knowledgeable about the subject and course material.
| (1) Not at all knowledgeable
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (5) Very knowledgeable
[5]
|
4 |
|
67% |
67% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.67
|
10. Accessibility outside of class.
| (1) Not at all accessible
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (5) Very accessible
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| Mean: ** |
4.25
|
11. Enthusiasm for topic/subject.
| (1) Not at all enthusiastic
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (5) Very enthusiastic
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.67
|
12. Designed and used fair grading procedures.
| (1) Not at all fair
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
| (5) Very fair
[5]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.83
|
13. Provided adequate feedback on exams/papers/performance.
| (1) Not adequate
[1]
|
1 |
|
17% |
17% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
33% |
33% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Very adequate
[5]
|
3 |
|
50% |
50% |
| Not applicable / No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.67
|
14. Use this space for any comments you may have about the course, the instructor, readings, etc.
- Professor Narahari is a great professor! Although his class is very difficult/demanding and he expects a lot from the students, it allowed us to learn a lot about databases.
- The homework went perfectly with the exams, and this was a major plus.
Department-Specific Questions
15. I had met all the specified prerequisites for the course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
4 |
|
67% |
80% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.80
|
16. My previous coursework had adquately prepared me for the course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
3 |
|
50% |
60% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.60
|
17. Through the course, I gained considerable experience in effective techniques for solving real world problems.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
3 |
|
50% |
60% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.40
|
18. My skills in design have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.20
|
19. My skills in programming have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00
|
20. My skills in communication have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
3 |
|
50% |
60% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00
|
21. My skills in teamwork have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| Mean: ** |
4.00
|
22. My skills in social responsibility or ethics have been helped by taking this course.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
3 |
|
50% |
60% |
| Mean: ** |
4.50
|
23. The textbooks and/or recommended resources were helpful.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (2)
[2]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
3.00
|
24. Homework, projects and other assignments were effective in reinforcing learning.
| (1) Do not agree
[1]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (2)
[2]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| (3)
[3]
|
1 |
|
17% |
20% |
| (4)
[4]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| (5) Strongly agree
[5]
|
2 |
|
33% |
40% |
| Not applicable/No opinion
[x]
|
0 |
|
0% |
0% |
| Mean: ** |
4.20
|
25. The course provided a useful balance between theory and practice.
|